Undoubtedly, over the course of my ministry I have been thrown into some challenging situations. Some that I knew exactly what I signed up for, others that came as a definite surprise. To be sure, I have often had to embrace God’s words to Joshua as if He were speaking them directly to me.
Joshua 1:9 “…be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go."
In my first experience as a Senior Pastor, the church was medium sized and I was specifically hired to transition their traditional ministry into becoming a thriving contemporary, growing church. Now obviously, that’s a challenge to say the least. Yet, I knew what I was walking into and what I had signed up for. I knew that there would be many moments of needed healing within the congregation as a result of change (regardless of how positive) over time. Imagine having (among others) the simultaneous roles of a spiritual surgeon, makeover artist, and bodybuilder, adding to that all the growing pains there would be in leading an entire organization of people to new life and a new identity. Many people say they want change, but then when it actually happens, it can be a different story, thus the need for frequent moments of relational/church healing. Every stage in a church’s life and growth have unique dynamics and challenges, all of which require intentional skills in relationships/church healing, especially among staff and key leaders.
In another church situation, the challenges were even more daunting, very serious, and all discovered by surprise. Unknown to me upon my arrival, the church was in serious, terminal inner conflict and spiritual apathy, and their less than pleasant history had been concealed. The challenges I faced were intentionally hidden and left for me to run into over time. Sounds like a blast, doesn’t it? The congregation needed major healing. Yet in that situation, there was an additional level of healing needed to take place over time, the healing I needed from being disillusioned and being intentionally led astray. What I discovered wasn’t what I signed up for. Two entities needed healing, myself and the congregation.
The truth is, every church needs healing at some level. Bad things happen to and in good churches, and good churches can and do have some bad things happen from time to time. Healing is a continual aspect of every church because churches are filled with relationships and relational systems of all kinds, and rightly so. Relationships are a beautifully big part of what church should be all about.
In nearly every kind of relationship, there will be moments of conflict, some larger than others. But wherever there is conflict at any level, there will always be a need for healing. You can’t change the fact that you aren’t going to get every relationship, every decision, every conversation just right, but you can change how you handle it when you get it wrong, or when someone happens to wrong you. That’s where a congregation can begin to learn the art and necessity of healing.
There are several questions a congregation and its leadership need to ask in order to know best how to go about the efforts to heal their congregation or segments of it. Some issues that cause the need for healing in a congregation hit the congregation as a whole, others hit pockets of the church.
Question 1- At the heart, is the issue(s) in the church more vision related or interpersonal related?
Believe it or not, most issues in church that need healing are at the base, issues of vision. Yes, they may become personally and emotional charged among relationships in the church. Yes, they may cause all kinds of interpersonal spills and become super-spiritualized, but at the heart, many times they simply boil down to an issue of vision.
Unfortunately, often by the time you get the chance to address the issues of vision, the whole thing has become so personally and emotionally charged that people have a hard to healing the emotional wounds even when they can learn to find a way to resolve the issues of vision.
So many conflicts could be kept from going nuclear and thus in need of major healing intervention if it was recognized early on that the issues were more about vision than anything else.
Another sub questions in all of this is, if it’s an issue of vision, is it about a non-essential issue or an essential issue within the church? Every church needs to determine what beliefs and values are essential in the life and ethos of the church, and which are non-essential. Obviously, people will have their own sense of what is essential or not, but having an understanding of this for the church will help you teach and encourage your way towards healing. Every conflict is an opportunity to teach and come back to the heart, vision, and values of your ministry. Teaching helps bring perspective and understanding to issues that may simply lack wisdom and insight.
Most of the time, people are hurt and issues emerge when they feel they can’t, aren’t, or don’t know how to buy in or be a part of the vision for the church. People desire to be significant and needed, the moment it appears to them that something is leading away from that, you can bet on it, issues needing healing are going to emerge, and fast.
One time, after first arriving as the new pastor of the church I currently serve, a gentleman quickly wanted to sit me down and talk about the issues he didn’t agree with in the church, all of them vision related at the heart. If I didn’t recognize that these issues were really more about vision and really just wanting to find a place within that vision where he could buy in and be a part, the conversation good have easily turned into a personal, emotionally charged, and uncomfortable meeting. However, two important things happened.
One, I was able to teach him about what and why the Church held to certain issues of vision, helping him see the thoughtfulness, care, and heart behind who we desire to be as a Church, even if he still did not agree. More importantly, I began to point out so many other areas where he agreed and valued the same things that the Church did. At the end, I asked, “With all the things you agree on about our church, we need your support, do you think you could agree to disagree about these couple things (all of which were non-essentials for the church) cause we sure do need you.” A smile came upon face and enthusiasm lifted his non-verbals. “Absolutely, Pastor Chris, I’m glad I stopped by.”
Having a good sense of what are essential issues for the church will help in doing your best to “If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone” Are there times when you run into a situation where there is an issue that presents no room for compromise, and the only way things can be resolved is for the person to move in a new direction, perhaps even transitioning to another church? Sure.
For some, this reality can cause a sense of fear and dread towards conflict. And to be sure, most leaders want as many people to “buy in,” grow, and put their hands to plow as possible. Yet, those moments where an insurmountable issue surfaces can be seen as an opportunity to help that person best steward God’s calling and direction for their lives and for the church. Sometimes, the result will be that the person will have a change of heart or mind, other times it will mean something else. Your role in the situation can simply be in helping that person make the most faithful stewardship decision in regards to the use of their calling, gifts, and resources for ministry.
Yet, in all this, it’s equally important to know that a conflict that shows itself to mainly be about an issue of vision, can in fact, really be an interpersonal issue at heart. There have been times I have had people come to my office to present me with some kind of vision-related issue that they feel has caused them to need to step down or even completely leave the church. But, after digging around a little bit, frequently I soon discover that something or (more likely) someone hurt their feelings.
When the issues are more interpersonal in nature, here again, it’s important to distinguish what is really going on at the base level. It’s amazing how when you deal with the interpersonal problem behind it all, the surface issue(s) of vision quickly takes a back seat.
Some time ago, I had a staff person come to me and announce their deep concerns about the direction of church, even suggesting their difficulty in getting on board. I was surprised, and even a bit confused by this sudden announcement. Soon, I realized that it wasn’t about church direction. As we talked more and more, I steered the conversation in such a way to discover that the real issue was that his wife was offended by something I said to her in passing several months ago. It turned out to be a miscommunication, but it was allowed to simmer and grow over several months until finally it came out as an issue of vision. Once things were cleared up between myself and his wife, the vision issue went away and healing emerged.
Question 2- What is the scope of the issue(s) needing healing?
When Paul, in the Bible, used the analogy of our physical bodies to describe the nature of the church, he gave us some beautiful wisdom to draw from when seeking to heal a congregation.
Just like your body, a church can handle bumps and bruises of conflict, but multiple or widespread conflicts are tougher, as it is with your body. Burn the tip of your finger, it hurts, but you’ll be just fine. Burn your hand, it will hurt more, but once healed, you’ll be able to carry on. Burn your entire arm, now things get dicey. Burn your arms and both your legs from the knees down, and things are at a very critical level. So it is with the wounds that a church can incur.
Every church has it’s own tolerance level of change, pain, and conflict. Ideally, you never want to get too close to this level, at least not for long, and you certainly don’t want to bend the meter passed it if you can help it.
In the church I referenced at the beginning of this article where I was hired to lead significant change, often in staff and leadership conversations I would ask, “How are we doing, where are we on the change meter?” Just like your body, the change, growth, and even pain that results from positive progression can be tolerated and even harnessed if managed carefully. But sometimes, for all kinds of reason, a church can be burdened with more pain and change than the can manage and still function normally at the same time.
That’s why diagnosing the level of the issue is critical. How widespread is it, who does it involve? Is there a significant level of disunity, hurt, or discouragement among the staff? How long has the issue been going on in the church or part of the church? How has the ministry suffered due to this area of needed healing?
Questions like this help to understand the severity and scope of the issue(s) needing healing, and ultimately prepare us to be willing to ask one of the most important questions…
Do we need an outside, professional consultant to help us understand the issue(s) and how to move towards healing?
Many times a Church can move towards healing on their own as their leadership culture becomes skilled at preventing and working through places of needed healing in the congregation. But sometimes, even the best staff and leaders need to get outside help.
Here are a few links to some quality Church consultant groups…
http://www.rainergroup.com
http://www.churchdoctor.or
http://www.lifecatalystcon
Question 3- What process/attempts has been used to bring healing to the issue(s)?
Have you ever been to a gathering of somebody else’s family, and the way they treat each other surprises you as their interactions are more harsh, callous, and unloving than what you are used to. They seem to give no thought to the way they hurt, disappoint, or offend each other.
Believe it or not, in the same way, some church families can become very callous, cold, and unloving in the way they treat each other and do ministry together. Overtime, a culture of disunity, emotional distance, and poor relationships and relational skills become an overall part of the system and ethos of the church. They may be able to put on a veneer of appearances that everything is warm and cozy among people in the church, but peal back a layer or two and it’s there. They are like a frozen hamburger you don’t heat up long enough in the microwave; warm on the outside, but frozen on the inside.
A great question to ask of the culture in your congregation is… do people sense it when there are issues of healing that need to be addressed? Does your church have an emotional and relational radar up and running to detect when there are areas of tension, disunity, pain, or hurt that need to be addressed?
There will always be a certain level of conflict and hurt that need healing in a congregation, that is constant. The question is, when conflict and hurt happen, is it addressed and healed where possible? Do people know how to do this? Obviously not every fence can be mended and some people thrive on conflict and playing the victim card. But, what is the overall value of peace, love, and togetherness in the culture of the church?
On one side, some churches won’t make even some of the simplest decisions unless everybody is all warm and fuzzy about it and the moment there is any sense of conflict, disagreement, hurt, or pain in the church, they immediately go to DEFCON-5 mode. Other churches could care less. For at least a segment of the church, it’s our way or the highway, there is no attempt to bring others along with patience and grace. If people run into problems along the way in their church life and involvement, suck it up and get over it.
In my humble view, both are in error. One church is consensus driven, the other is agenda driven.
Paul strikes the proper balance between the two, “If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.”
No, you can’t have perfect unity and harmony about everything all the time. Jesus himself (perfect in love) let people walk away from following him without even chasing them down and begging them to reconsider. Yet, we need to do our very best to bring people along and to maintain the very highest quality of relationships, community, and togetherness we can as a church moves forward and fulfills her calling as she’s led by Spirit of God.
One of the things I believe this means is that a church should develop a written, biblical process for handling conflict. This process should involve plenty of listening, objectivity, resolution strategies, and seek to be as fair and love-driven as possible. The process should spell out the details, when and how it should be used, what each step involves, and who carries it out. Every church needs to decide where “the buck stops” in terms of conflict resolution. For some, it’s the congregation, for others it’s a leadership or eldership team. Whatever the case may be, at times somebody has to make the final ruling on issues of conflict, if after going through the process, resolution is not obtained.
An established conflict resolution process brings consistency, maturity, and a thorough road map towards healing for issues needing healing in a church.
Every person involved in a church holds a bucket of water and a bucket of gasoline in their hands, especially volunteers and leaders. When the sparks of conflict, hurt, pain, or disunity flicker, either they can poor water on it, or gasoline. How they handle it determines which bucket is used. An established process for conflict resolution maximizes the potential for the cool waters of healing to occur instead of more damage being done and things even inflaming out of control.
A process for handling conflict reduces some of the fear and dread people have towards conflict and it helps a congregation see conflict as an opportunity for growth for all involved.
Question 4- What is the congregation’s overall sense of what congregational peace and unity look like?
In the second church I referenced in the opening of this article, one of the things that led to so much conflict, disunity, and strife crippling the church from its inception was due to the reality that the highest and most prized level of unity was based on friendships, friendship groups, and business relationships. Thus, the keeping of friendships, friendship groups, and business relationships trumped any higher, unifying factors like an overall shared church vision that drew people to Christ, compelled them to spiritual maturity, and united them in a shared mission to change the world as a unique body of believers called by God. Friendships and business acquaintances fueled and founded the church, not the church fueling and founding friendships and groups unified in Christ and a calling to be His people together in mutual mission. The church came out of and existed for friendships and business relationships, not the church creating friendships and relationships of all types and needs as they live out and seek to fulfill their ultimate calling by God. There is a huge difference.
The lower a Church’s sense of what unifies and fuels a church, the higher the potential for conflict, disunity, and disharmony. A Church can minimize the general amount of hurts in a congregation that need to be healed simply by raising the level of their vision to pursue their highest calling, guarded by the highest of values, fueled by the giving of their very best to pursue an encounter with God that they live to give away to others.
Indeed the scriptures are true, Proverbs 29:18 “Where there is no vision (pursuing God revelation) the people will perish” -parenthesis mine.
One effective way to keep a canoe of people from eventually getting sideways with each other, hurting each others feelings, and capsizing the entire canoe, is to show them and compel them to focus their efforts on pursuing a direction and purpose higher than themselves and even their togetherness.
For some, peace can be seen as merely being tolerant of others. However, Jesus taught us to love our enemies, not just tolerate them To others, peace requires nothing less than conformity and perfect harmony to be attained. No wonder why a congregation needs to be intentional in helping people see what healthy, true peace looks like and comes from for a congregation. The way a congregation envision what peace looks like for them as a church will greatly govern how and if hurts are healed, to what extent, and whether or not true peace and unity will ever be realized.
Pastors, staff, and key leaders are well served to continually teach on what peace and unity looks like in their church, the importance of its value, and how to foster and protect it. This will go a long way towards building and sustaining a church culture where hurts individually and corporately are put under the Lordship of Jesus Christ, and thus moved towards healing and the ultimate strengthening of the Church and its people.
If you are like me, as a parent you never want to see your child “give up” on something. Whether it’s plans they have established, a team they are on, or a promise they have made. And so we teach them phrases like, “You need to finish what you start” and “Quitters never win, and winners never quit.” And rightly so, giving up is not a principal that one is served well to live by. In our convenience-laddened culture, the idea of “giving up” comes much too easily and prematurely. Many simply “give up” the moment the going gets tough or causes them inconvenience. Indeed, commitment is the willingness to be unhappy for a while.
Yet, at the same time, there are times when we need to backpedal. That is, we get into a situation we thought was healthy, right, and in the flow of God, only to clearly find out, it wasn’t. The writings are all over the wall, “something is deeply wrong and even evil here” or “there is something not of God about this” or “this is not something for which God is anointing you.” You may not see those messages with your physical eyes or hear them with your ears, but your discernment and spiritual eyes see it clearly. It’s not a matter of trying harder, cow-boying up, or just enduring a difficult season. It’s not about you merely being frustrated, tired, hurt, or discouraged. It’s about that fact that you pedaled into something thinking it was God’s leading, only to find out, God’s no longer into it, He was never into it from the beginning, or He isn’t into it for you.
Obviously, this takes some skills in discernment to know the difference. God often leads us into situations that are challenging to grow our character and dependence on Him. But at the same time, Satan loves to entice us into things that waste our time, steal our joy, and distract us from God’s true leading in our life.
What’s the difference? God’s presence.
The moment you feel God’s presence/anointing leave you or a situation, it’s time to back pedal, and fast. Yet, as long as you sense God’s presence/anointing, you should never give up.
There have been times of great challenge, adversity, pain, and struggle in my life where in my head I wanted to give up, and could come up with all kinds of reasons and excuses as to why I should and could even spiritualize them. However, God presence/anointing was still there, and so I couldn’t give up. It’s hard to explain in words, but to those who are sensitive to it and seek it out, you can have a sense of what God is anointing (putting His presence into) in your life, and what He isn’t.
Recently, Harrison signed up to play challenge-level soccer. He made the U-11 team and was excited about the season ahead. Yet from the beginning, with coaching problems, parent problems, and player problems, we began to discern, “something isn’t right here.” But instead of pulling the trigger too soon, we decided to give it time and see what happens, even to the point I agreed to be the head coach of the team, even after two coaches had previously opted out. Yet the more I got involved, the more the signs became loud and clear, “something really isn’t right here” and this wasn’t a battle God wanted me to fight.
In life, we need to choose our battles carefully, and especially make sure that if you
tee-it-up for battle, God better be in it with you. Sometimes we take on challenges and battles God never gave us the green light for. And then we wonder why we tire easily, get bruised and battered, and ultimately wind up discouraged and even defeated.
So what did we do? We back pedaled. We didn’t give up on soccer and I didn’t give up on coaching. Not a chance. Rather, we backpedaled off the team and redirected ourselves to another opportunity for Harrison and our family where we felt God was putting His presence into. It wasn’t an easy decision, but one we knew we had to make if we wanted to be in God’s flow for our family.
Three great questions we all need to ask about every opportunity before us…
1) Is this God’s will? 2) Is this God’s will for me? 3) Is this God’s will for me at this time?
And even after all of your best discernment, always remember, there is nothing wrong with backpedaling when you find yourself into something God is simply not into, or God is simply not into for you.
Should Christians get involved in Politics?
There is a growing debate among Christians and otherwise as to whether or not God desires His Church and its people to be involved in political aspects of our culture. Some, even debate whether Christians should be involved in trying to minister to or influence culture at all. This is certainly not a new debate in history, but one that has taken more of a center stage over the last several years, perhaps because of some conservative “right wing” evangelicals' aggressive pursuit to have political influence in addition to a growing pietistic/separatist segment developing out of the reformed church movement.
As with most issues (ironically largely motivated by politics within Christendom) many Christians have taken up sides under one of two positions. One (the pietist) states that “sin” is the only issue God desires Christians to deal with and therefore anything more or less than preaching the Gospel is unfaithful for the Christian and a waste of time. Their belt buckle verse is, “My Kingdom is not of this world.” Others (the activists) believe that God’s truth and purposes are to touch and influence all of life, not just personal morality. They believe that God’s Church and its people are the primary tool that God uses to redeem, reclaim, and restore all aspects of the world, its culmination being where God “restores all thing unto Himself.” Their belt buckle verse is, “Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”
On the topic, John Barber articulates some interesting perspectives, “What is the fundamental problem? It is that both pietists and activists are biblically lopsided. Normally, Christian, social activists are committed to the Cultural Mandate, while typically Christian pietists are dedicated to the Great Commission. Activists stress change at the institutional level, while pietists contend that real change in society is only possible to the extent that human hearts are changed. A new Christian activism will seek to restore planet earth by combining both the activists' stress upon cultural restoration and the pietists' emphasis upon evangelism and discipleship.”
Each side of course has their own list of scriptures they line up as defense and cause for their view, what’s new right? Perhaps (other than denominational politics) there in lies the root of the problem. Why not seek the whole counsel of God in the Bible, not just a line-up of supporting verses?
Here are some personal thoughts that govern my humble view on the matter.
If the whole counsel of God in the Bible clearly showed, modeled, and commissioned the people of God to only deal with personal sin and refrain from any other attempts to shape or minister to culture, then there would be no debate. Yet, this is not the case, from Genesis to Revelation, you hear God’s call and see God’s example in influencing the entire world and every aspect in it, from the personal to the political, from a national level to an individual level. Trying to dance around the scriptural megaphone that declares this witness is eyebrow raising at best.
Granted, make no mistake, the salvation of people is the utmost of importance and some segments of the contemporary, social-driven church have led it to move away from this priority. This is indeed wrong and disturbing. However, that does not negate the important place of God’s other forms of redemptive work and the Christian’s responsibility to engage in it. Why, in response to one mistake, do we always swing the pendulum into making another mistake?
It’s a no brainer, as Christians we should never put our hope in any form of government or culture other than the rule and reign of Christ, yet though I do not turn to the world nor any government for my hope or salvation, it doesn’t mean that I have no responsibility to use any and all opportunities to bring God’s work of transformation to every aspect of life and living even while knowing the fullness of this God-powered, transformative change will not culminate until Jesus returns.
I can submit to government peacefully, yet harness the presence and power of Christ promised to dwell within me through the Holy Spirit to impact it and shape it at the same time. I can understand that God’s kingdom is “yet to come” and yet I can come with/bring the Kingdom to every aspect of life at the same time. Not only is this something I can do, it is something I should do.
What many seem to want to make into an “either/or” issue, in my humble view, the scriptures show to be a “both/and” issue.
Whatever the case may be, chances are, we all have been in what are a called a "high maintenance" relationship. Typically, we find ourselves in "high maintenance" relationships with people who are perfectionists, insecure, controlling, irresponsible, victimizers, or overly negative.
Unfortunately, sometimes we can be in a "high maintenance" relationship with a person and not realize it. Overtime, the weight, burden, and pressures of the relationship increase without us realizing the moment when they crossed the line from being healthy to unhealthy. Only when the relationship ends and we disconnect do we wake up and see the reality that the relationship had evolved into a "high maintenance" fiasco.
I have had friendships over the years that have ended and yes, I was disappointed, hurt, and had to grieve the loss. These are typical emotions to the ending of any friendship or relationship that you invested any worth in. Yet, in some cases, what I did not expect was the additional giddy feeling of release that came with the closure of the friendship. I was surprised to feel like an unhealthy burden had been released, and a never ending pressure had finally ended.
Could it actually be that I was in a "high maintenance" relationship and didn't realize it? I believe so.
In those friendships, after I stepped back and gained perspective, I typically realized that with the person involved, deep down I felt a constant pressure to live up to their voiced and unvoiced expectations. With some people, you just get a sense that your best efforts are just never going to measure up. I remember with one person, with every move forward there was the disappointment that things hadn't progressed more. And worst of all, I had the sense that no matter how I handled their disappointments or mine with the relationship or each other's performance, I was always going to be made to be at blame or at fault. At times, I got the real sense that no matter how I handled issues in the relationship or otherwise, there was a trap waiting to be sprung, and Chris Kratzer was going to be the catch of the day.
The Bible calls us to love one another, to consider others better than ourselves, carry each other's burdens, and to live at peace with one another. Yet, other passages (and some of the same ones) let us clearly know that we are to set healthy boundaries, seek God's approval more than people's, not become enablers, flee from evil, and seek God's desires and worship Him above all.
Romans 12:8 reads... "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." With the words "if it is possible" Paul acknowledges the reality, "as hard as you try, it isn't going to always be possible to be able to please everybody and live up to the expectations 'high maintenance' people can lay before you, nor should you."
In Galatians 6:2, 5 first Paul says... "Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ." but then in verse 5 he says... "for each one should carry his own load."
The simple idea (reflected in the greek words for "burden" and "load") is that we have an obligation to help people who genuinely have more than they can truly handle. Yet, by God's design, people need to learn to take responsibility for the areas in their life they alone are responsible for and are capable of doing so. God created us with a lot of responsibilities... areas where we alone have the "ability-to-respond" to issues, needs, challenges, choices, etc. in our life.
The problem with "high maintenance" relationships is that the person often uses guilt with great expertise in order to entice you into carrying what is actually not a genuine burden but rather their own load, which they are actually capable of being responsible for but choose not to be.
Well intentioned people sometimes have a desire to "rescue" people. In certain circumstances where a "high maintenance" type personality is involved, I wonder if God isn't yelling from above "Stop trying to rescue them, I have them broken for a reason and if you run interference, they will never learn to carry their own load and discover the freedom of learning to pull their own wagon (so to speak)" Many "High maintenance" personalities have an unwritten sign "Rescue me from what I can actually solve myself and need to solve myself" if you are willing to see it instead of rushing in and giving your best try at being superman (0r woman) in order to appease your false guilt or stroke your ego.
In a world where some people are experts at playing the victim and outsourcing their life to become everybody else's responsibility, it's hard at times to discern a genuine burden from a person who just needs to suck it up and do the hard work of carrying their own load, as painful, inconvenient, emotionally difficult, and involved that might be. Sometimes a "high maintenance" person can't do it all, but additionally, they aren't even willing to do their part or do the hard work of moving towards being able to eventually "carry their own load." It's much more glamourous and self-gratifying to sweep in and "save the day" even if it winds up in enabling irresponsibility than it is to do the hard work of loving people enough to challenge and equip those who are receptive to "carry their own load."
The scriptures above, and many others like them, show us important principals that frame love in such away as to create the needed context in which all the aspects of a genuine, Christ-like loving relationship can occur. Unfortunately, a "high maintenance" relationship can squelch out the environment for a Christ-like relationship to occur as it bends, twists, and even removes healthy emotional, physical and spiritual boundaries. Both the person who is "high maintenance" and the person who allows for that aspect to enter into the relationship are at fault.
In my circumstance, with some of the friendships I have had, I should have never allowed myself to buy into the pursuit of trying to please and appease a perfectionist, controlling personality or feel that in some way I should be able to. Bringing people close to you who are seemingly never satisfied, demanding, overly negative, victimizers, or are over-enthralled with their own ways can be a formula for an extended stay at "High Maintenance Hotel" where you can check in, but there is a sense you may never be able to leave.
We need to love people, but never above our love of God and His desires, and sometimes that love requires us to painfully let people or challenge people to have to learn to "carry their own load." Or, in my case, it means getting off the impossible/burdensome tread mill of trying to fulfill expectations and standards imposed by a person, not God.
Perfectionist, controlling, overly negative, victimizing, insecure personalities tempt us to hop onto the never ending tread mill of trying to carry and satisfy the impossible burden of their expectations, demands, needs, and problems, many of which have solutions that only they can embrace and expectations and standards that only they have imposed on your life, not God.
Setting the boundaries and keeping the balance is key 1) discern and help carry genuine burdens as best you can, discern and love enough to allow or challenge others to carry their own load. 2) Meet the expectations and strive for the standards God imposes, not ones imposed by others in their relationship with you.
What I haven't heard as of yet is the kind of answer I would give to these two questions...
How could this happen? It's simple... greed, selfishness, and dishonesty. The real problem with the financial crisis has little to do with money, but the condition of people's hearts. It is symptom of a much deeper problem, not financial mismanagement, but heart and soul mismanagement. This is in fact, a spiritual problem that requires much more than a fiscal solution.
I sought the LORD, and he answered me; he delivered me from all my fears. Psalm 34:4
11 The LORD said, "Go out and stand on the mountain in the presence of the LORD, for the LORD is about to pass by." Then a great and powerful wind tore the mountains apart and shattered the rocks before the LORD, but the LORD was not in the wind. After the wind there was an earthquake, but the LORD was not in the earthquake. 12 After the earthquake came a fire, but the LORD was not in the fire. And after the fire came a gentle whisper. 13 When Elijah heard it, he pulled his cloak over his face and went out and stood at the mouth of the cave. 1 Kings 9:11-12
Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light for my path Psalm 119:105
Tune me into foot-tapping songs,
set these once-broken bones to dancing.
Don't look too close for blemishes,
give me a clean bill of health.
God, make a fresh start in me,
shape a Genesis week from the chaos of my life.
Don't throw me out with the trash,
or fail to breathe holiness in me.
Bring me back from gray exile,
put a fresh wind in my sails!
Give me a job teaching rebels your ways
so the lost can find their way home.
Commute my death sentence, God, my salvation God,
and I'll sing anthems to your life-giving ways.
Unbutton my lips, dear God;
I'll let loose with your praise.
The other day, Harrison and I, along with Amy and Cailyn were at the Mall. Lately, I have been taking "Million-dollar bills" with me to give to people or just place on the ground for people to pick up. Each Million-dollar bill has a effective Gospel message. In the past, I have never been a fan of cheesy Gospel tracts, but the ones I have found, are nothing like that. This time, along with Million-dollar bills, we took along some other cool tracts to test out. One looks exactly like a wallet that you drop on the ground, but when the person picks it up they open it to read about the saving message and work of Jesus Christ."The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance." 2 Peter 3:9
Throwing out any pretense of being neutral in the culture war, McDonald's has taken up the rhetoric of gay activists, suggesting those who oppose same-sex marriage (SSM) are motivated by hate.
AFA has asked for a boycott of McDonald's restaurants because of the company’s promotion of the gay agenda. AFA asked McDonald’s to remain neutral in the culture war. McDonald’s refused.
In response to the boycott, McDonald's spokesman Bill Whitman suggested to the Washington Post that those who oppose SSM are motivated by hate, saying "...hatred has no place in our culture." McDonald's has decided to adopt the "hate" theme used by gay activist groups for years.
Whitman went on to say, "We stand by and support our people to live and work in a society free of discrimination and harassment." Mr. Whitman has intentionally avoided addressing the reason for the boycott. This boycott is not about hiring gays or how gay employees are treated. It is about McDonald's choosing to put the full weight of their corporation behind promoting their agenda.
McDonald's donated $20,000 to the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce in exchange for membership and a seat on the group’s board of directors. The NGLCC lobbies Congress in support of same-sex marriage.
McDonald's CEO Jim Skinner said the company will promote issues they approve. "Being a socially responsible organization is a fundamental part of who we are. We have an obligation to use our size and resources to make a difference in the world...and we do."
Thoughts on the Doctrine of Election and the surrounding debate.
I must admit, I am a bit of a newbie when it comes to the doctrine of election. In so being, I have researched the subject and looked at various views on the extreme debate that surrounds this doctrine. As John MacArthur suggests in a recent audio interview, it’s not the kind of doctrine that should be the cause for division or used to storm the gates of your church.
I believe the context of the current state of church affairs within the Evangelical church is important when understanding the recent rise of publicity and interpretation this doctrine has gained with vigorous debate resulting. If there is one thing this doctrine emphasizes and brings to bare it is God’s sovereignty. The current landscape of the Church is filled with contemporary/postmodern movements and fads that have turned stage lighting, mood music, razzle-dazzle, cultural relevance, altruistic community service, inspiring messages and publicities stunts into the believed power of God unto salvation. This of course has moved man and his efforts to the central figure in God’s salvation work and the ultimate purposes of God’s church. Thus, subverting the power of God and the Gospel to a lesser position and priority.
In response, the most sovereign filled doctrine has been dusted off and brought to table to correct the man-centered movements of the modern church; that is, the doctrine of election.
Though there are varying interpretations, here first is the Calvinist’s position as described by Cooper P. Abrams, III in his article on the debate “Is Calvinism or Arminianism Biblical? A Biblical Explanation of the Doctrine of Election.”
Simply stated, Calvinism claims that God predestined or elected some people to be saved and others to be lost. Those elected to salvation are decreed by God to receive salvation and cannot resist God's grace. However, those that God elected to be lost are born eternally condemned to the Lake of Fire, with no hope of salvation.
Calvinists are divided into three groups: the extreme Hyper-Calvinist, the Five Point Calvinists and the Moderate Calvinists. The Hyper and Five Point Calvinists hold to the five points of Calvinism, shown in the acrostic below. The Moderate Calvinist may accept one or more of these five points, but not all. The Hyper, and Five Point Calvinist teaching of limited atonement is generally rejected by the Moderate Calvinist.
T - Total depravity of man.
U - Unconditional election.
L - Limited atonement.
I - Irresistible grace.
P - Perseverance of the saints.
Basically, Calvinism teaches that a man is totally depraved, and unable to receive salvation. The Calvinist assumes that man's has no freedom in his coming to Christ and receiving salvation. He teaches that God, exercising His sovereignty, first elected and decreed certain individuals to salvation in time past. Christ's death was not for all people, but only for the elect. God then extended "irresistible" grace to those He elected.
It is important to note that some notables who are of the Calvinist belief do assert that there is both a sense of God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility that combine in a kind of mystery that is beyond human ability to explain. Some assert that election does not shut the door on salvation for anyone, and does not destroy man’s free will. Therefore it is not election of salvation, but election unto salvation.
On the other side of the coin, Mr. Abrams in his same article goes onto explain the Armenian position on the doctrine of election.
Armenians presented the view that God was indeed sovereign and elected men to be saved. Arminius taught that election was based on God's foreknowledge of who would by faith accept Christ and who would reject Him. He taught all men could be saved if they exercised their wills and believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He rejected the idea that atonement was limited to a few and that God was the author of sin. Arminius insisted that Christ died for all men and saves all who receive Him by faith. Arminius was doctrinally weak in the area of eternal security of the believer. Eternal security means that once a person is saved, he cannot lose his salvation. Arminius thought the Scriptures were unclear and seemed to teach believers could lose their salvation. Most, who identify themselves as Arminians, believe that a person can be saved and afterwards lose their salvation.
Just as those that followed John Calvin carried his teachings to extremes, many who succeeded James Arminius carried the matter a step further, teaching that man had a part in salvation. The Arminians, as they became known, teach that man took part with God in salvation. The natural conclusion of this was that salvation could be lost. If through man's efforts salvation is acquired, then through his actions salvation could be lost. The belief can be expressed this way; Christ made the down payment on our salvation on the cross, however, once a person is saved he has to keep up the payments through being faithful and with good works. This is a serious error because it bases salvation on the ability of a person to merit his salvation by his good works. The Bible condemns this false teaching: "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast" (Eph. 2:8-9).
It should also be noted that there are those of the false conversion persuasion who have not truly repented of their sins, thus their faith has not been a saving faith. True conversion is not marked by moral perfection, but by forsaking one's sin and thus resulting in a lifestyle away from sin and vigorously pursuing righteousness.
Abram’s article serves a compelling writing that brings to light the notion that perhaps both the Calvinist’s and Armenians are both inaccurate at points in their assertions of the doctrine of election.
It is clear that the scriptures teach that God is 100% sovereign and yet humanity is 100% responsible. (See Article) Both are equally true. As a pastor friend of the Reformed tradition said to me “If a man goes to heaven, God gets all the glory, if a man goes to hell, he is fully responsible.” I even asked of this Pastor, can a man say to God, "I am not going to heaven not because I don’t want to, but because you didn’t want me to?” No. As Ernest C Reisinger states " Election does not prevent the salvation of any one who wants to be saved."
How these are both reconciled together can only be understood and accomplished by God himself, anyone who says they fully understands this is placing their sovereignty over God’s. Spurgeon’s solution was to model what Paul does in scripture, teach both side by side, and leave it to God to sort it out and bring them together.
Therefore, where the doctrine of election produces a sense of humble wonderment and the realization that we cannot fully know the mind of God, it is has been stewarded well. Where the doctrine of election gives hope to the greatest of sinners and humbles the proud, it has been stewarded well. Where it emboldens and brings confidence to our evangelistic efforts, it has been stewarded well. Where the doctrine of election corrects many movements within the Church that water-down the power and supremacy of the Gospel and God’s sovereignty, it has been well stewarded.
Yet, ironically, when either the Calvinist or the Armenian claim interpretation rights and righteousness, they too begin to do the very thing they object, they begin to reduce the sovereignty of God as they try to de-mystery that which God gifts us as mystery that God may be glorified, not just in the actions of the doctrine but the doctrine itself. They remove the sacredness of such a sacred doctrine as it itself testifies to a Holy God whose nature is so beyond ourselves with majesty and glory incomprehensible. Not just the action/ramifications of God’s doctrine of election are beyond our minds, but the doctrine itself. For one group to treat this or any doctrine as their own, is to go against the God revelation and divine ownership and authorship of scripture.
The bickering and fighting between the many sides of this doctrine and the pride of trying to find position above another must end. These efforts speak of nothing else than attempting to use this doctrine in ways that directly appose the reason it was inspired in God’s word, to bring glory to God and assert his glory by the scriptures themselves.
Where this doctrine causes us to emphasize one (100% God’s Sovereignty) over the other (100% Human Responsibility) or vice versa, or speak of these separately with out the other, it has been taken out of its proper context and thus removed of its purpose. The doctrine of election serves as a vivid reminder from God that salvation and the very nature and mind of God is beyond men, and beyond our ability to fully grasp so that God may glorified not so that either the Calvinists or the Armenians obtain the self glory of winning an argument. Only God will win this argument under the disappointment and dropped jaws of many a Armenian and Calvinist.
Indeed, this a time where the centrality of God’s sovereignty and the power of the Gospel must be reclaimed in God’s church. Yet, let us all make sure that, especially when it comes to this doctrine, we are not acting against the very thing we desire by stripping the sovereignty of God’s doctrine of election as we assert that which God, in this instance, has removed us from concluding; that is, the full understanding of His ways.

Tragically, Steven Curtis Chapman's daughter Maria died Wednesday when one of her teenage brothers accidently hit her with an SVU in the driveway of their home in Tennessee.
The above video/song was written by Steven about his two youngest daughters. This story and song are powerful reminders to cherish our children.
Please pray for them in this deep time of sadness and loss.
Steven Curtis Chapman's official site is overflowing with traffic from those wishing to express their sympathies. If you'd like to show additional support, consider making a donation to Shaohannah's Hope, the family's foundation promoting the care of orphans from around the world. You can make a donation to the Maria Fund in memory of Maria Chapman by clicking here, or mailing donations to Shaohannah's Hope, c/o The Maria Fund, PO Box 647, Franklin TN, 37065. What better way to remember Maria Sue's life than helping to provide a life for others like herself?

Since then, she has separated herself from the lesbian relationship and is soon returning to the state her husband resides in as soon as he returns home from military service. Last Sunday, she attended our Church again. Evidently, before she left, she wanted to come back one more time. Imagine that, a person who was deeply convicted to the heart through God's law wants to return the very place where her conviction occurred? As she said to one person, "I wanted to come back one last time before I leave because I love this Church!" Yup, you read it right... "love"
Almost everything in modern, contemporary Church growth strategies goes against the very real results this woman's experience displays. Many people say that the last thing you want to do to reach "seekers" is to offend them or "turn them off." So make sure you make them as comfortable as you can and entertain them into taking God seriously. Be sure to make them feel good about themselves so they will keep coming back and consider the claims of Christ.
This woman was not entertained, though we certainly have a fantastic worship band. Her children were not blown away by some Disney-calibar children's ministry facility and program. No, rather in my message, she was cornered by God's law to the point of tears, shown how disgusting her choices were, given the only hope she has in Christ, and presented the opportunity to chart a new course.
The result... contrition, repentance, attendance, fellowship, and believe it or not, she is reading the Bible she was given by one of our members and sharing WOTM tracts with her friends.
Maybe I am off my rocker, but perhaps we should be putting our trust and focus simply and exclusively in the power of the Gospel and preparing the way for the work of the Holy Spirit instead of all the other stuff we think is so important to reach people, be relevant, and grow Churches.
Humble/Teachable/Gentle Spirit
One of the main factors that God looks for in a potential leader is a humble spirit. One has to truly worship God before they can lead other people to God.
Every leader God ever raised up in scripture first had a humbling, repenting, worshipful experience with God that shaped their overall attitude into a humble spirit before God.
If you worship yourself (pride) all you will do is lead people to yourself and self-seeking pursuits. Worship is a humbling act of humility. When you worship God you acknowledge your limitations, sin, brokenness and your desperate need for God, His salvation on the cross, and His will to prevail in your life.
Some people manage to turn humility into a source of pride as they draw attention to themselves through their humility. The essence of humility is to take the focus off of you and place it on God and his desires. Humility is the branch from which the fruit of gentleness grows. People who have humility are gentle with others, not forceful, abrasive, or deceitful. You can be gentle and an assertive go-getter at the same time.
Over the years, I have seen people with great skills and competency have their pride and arrogance disqualify them as leaders and render their skills ineffective in spiritual leadership. Behind every move they make is an underlying agenda to draw attention to themselves. They put their own benefit over and above the benefit of the spiritual organization. And all too often, when a person of pride is confronted or their expectations are not realized, they become more aggressive or passive aggressive, or they completely shut down and disconnect. Pride is the author of the book some people live by title “Fight or Flight.”
One of the manifestations of humility comes when a person displays a teachable spirit. Humility says there is always something to learn. Humbleness requires surrendering to God and His design and plan for your life. Having a teachable spirit means that you are open to being developed in any way that moves you further into God’s design and plan for your life. People who have a teachable spirit are prone to consider the reality that other people can impart wisdom and instruction
from which they could benefit. They are putty in the hands of God, waiting to be shaped and molded by God and the people whom God places over and with them.
The difference between confidence and pride is where a person places that confidence and what purpose it serves in their life. A person with a humble spirit will put confidence in God, His power, and purposes and use confidence as way to face the spiritual battles in their life and carry out the good work that God has begun in them. A person ruled by pride will put their confidence in themselves, their ideas, tenure, achievements, and pursuits and will use confidence as a way to intimidate, dominate, and a manipulate in order to compensate for deep rooted insecurity in their lives.
One way of testing for issues of pride is in seeing how a person responds and what they do after you have said “no.” to them.
Though people who have issues of pride may be very gifted, motivated, organized, and competent, their pride will turn their gifts towards the “dark-side” can ultimately go a long way in stealing from the kind of healthy leadership culture and effectiveness you are trying to develop.
Look for people with a humble, teachable, and gentle spirit.
Shared Vision
One of the most destructive forces in Church leadership is division and disunity.
Yet, at the same time, having expectations for unity where God allows for freedom can be equally counterproductive. Every spiritual organization needs to search the scriptures faithfully and allow God's counsel and revelation to determine what are going to be the essentials and non essentials of the values, beliefs and vision of the group. Once that is clearly established, every leader must be enthusiastically aligned to the essentials and allowed freedom in the nonessentials.
With nonessentials, shared vision will sometime need to mean that people agree to disagree and refrain from majoring on the minors. Non-essentials can be turned into essentials when agendas are made out of personal preferences. People who have a divisive spirit and an ax to grind to go with it, are the usual suspects when people gather around non essentials and make them into sources of strife and division.
One of the best ways to discern unity in shared vision is to ask the kind of questions that illumine what a person would do differently if given total freedom to run or shape the organization themselves. Their answers will go a long way at identifying areas of unity and potential disunity.
As many spiritual leaders have articulated, “Vision builds consensus, not the other way around.” Being crystal clear about the vision of your spiritual organization and raising up those who are enthusiastically aligned to the essentials of that vision will go a long way at promoting the effectiveness and health of the organization. Plans and strategies should bend and sway with flexibility, but vision should be well defined and consistent.
Raising up people who you think you can ultimately change, when it comes to areas of disunity in the essentials of vision, is a prescription for future problems. When God is ready, he will bring or identify the right person for the job. Never let the pressures of ministry expansion cause you to take short cuts on shared vision. Furthermore, no matter how large and complicated your spiritual leadership culture becomes, keep a close ear to the floor on your staff and the people with whom you do ministry so as to listen for areas of disunity. A small crack on the ceiling is much easier to fix before it turns into a huge one, but it takes more attention to spot it.
Loyalty
Loyalty means that in your conversion, you have forever stepped onto God's side of the cosmic battle between God and evil and you, first and foremost, will remain steadfast to God, His word, and purposes.
Loyalty is one of the most important ingredients to look for in a potential leader. Where there is a clear disregard or disrespect of the leadership culture of your organization or of those who make up the leadership, you can know for sure, you have identified a leadership candidate that is “no go for launch.” A person can have disagreements or areas of concern or counsel for the leadership and still be respectful.
One of the difficult dynamics of loyalty is that it often can’t be tested until you go into battle or face some kind of challenge with that person at your side. Sometimes you can tell a potential leader’s capacity for loyalty by the way they carry themselves in relationships and how they handle power and responsibility. Another way you can discern a potential leader’s capacity for loyalty is by investigating how they finished things up at the last place they worked or led. People who are loyal don’t walk away from things easily nor do they typically do so with carelessness.
Ministry challenges are often the times when true loyalty is tested. Loyalty is easy when things are sailing smoothly, but kick up the winds and the waves and you will quickly find out who is with you and who isn’t. You will find out who sees your relationship with them as an end, or a means to an end. People who are loyal will be careful, committed, and conscientious about what they do and how they work within the system and culture of your spiritual organization. They will see their relationship with you as one that transcends ministry and not depends on it. They will look for every reason to be for you when others are looking for ways to be against you.
Great “Followship”
Among our leadership at Eternity Church, we have a saying “Bad followship never equates to good leadership.”
One of the greatest hallmarks of a genuine Jesus follower isn’t that they carry around a huge Bible and parade their spirituality so that all can see and adore. Rather, it is that they are doing serious battle with the evil within and around and are passionately seeking to “work out” their salvation and grow some spiritual fruit on the vine. The godly sorrow that led them to repentance and thus salvation remains with them as they learn to, more and more, hate what is evil and love what is good. The greatest hallmark of a Jesus follower is that they are in fact following. And in turn that “following” results in self leadership. As in the book of James, faith without works is dead, so is leadership without followship.
Bad self leadership never leads to good people leadership.
People who are great followers are the kind of people you can tell are seriously fighting to grow spiritual in their lives, not for hype, but for true transformation that is evidenced in behavior. Words of correction or guidance don’t just roll of their back or become dismissed by cheap grace, but are seriously considered and put through the mill of discernment so they can be sure to hear God’s heart and desires.
People who are great followers understand that God created them to be in a constant state of spiritual progress. They embrace God’s growth movement in their life and value God’s life changing truth instead of consistently resisting it. People who are great followers have a healthy “fear” of the Lord. To be sure, none of us are always excited when God comes in and wants to move things around in our life. But in the end, great followers have an overall hunger and openness to putting more and more of their lives and living under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.
People who are great follower will take the heart the reality that you don’t really know the truth of Jesus Christ until you are actually live it as a lifestyle.
People who are great followers will have a meaningful, daily devotion life as they pray passionately study the scriptures and commit them to their heart and memory. They will take the Word of God seriously and see it as the ultimate authority for their living. People who are great followers will be life long learners and engaged in classes and small group offerings where they can spiritually grow in the context of meaningful relationships. They will be people who practice the spiritual disciplines of financial giving and serving on a consistent, regular basis. They will be people who desire and utilize opportunities to share the Gospel with the lost and worship the Savior in His sanctuary. People who are great followers will be lovers of healthy accountability so that their leadership and service can be protected by Godly guidance and authority. And when they fail, as Charles Spurgeon suggests, their repentance will be louder than their sin.
Positive Attitude
Leaders need to always keep in mind the chemistry and ethos of their ministry teams and staff. Bringing on board a person with a bad attitude will potentially pull a dark cloud over the ministry and the team that leads it. Nothing weighs down the work of God more perhaps than a bad attitude.
The greatest challenge with people who have attitude problems is that it is very hard to change them. Often times, only the power of the Holy Spirit can brighten up a person’s outlook, especially since no one can choose their attitudes for them. If we have a bad attitude, it is no one else’s fault but our own.
At Eternity Church, we typically move people who have considerable attitude issues into a discipleship mode, not a leadership mode. The context of leadership is not the most conducive environment in which to deal with and minister to serious attitude problems, nor is it the most appropriate context to deal with issues where a person is significantly lacking in other indicators mentioned in this article.
Waiting to raise only people up who have positive/joyful attitudes is like waiting for the ice cream to melt a little bit before you try to scoop it out; it’s so much easier, it doesn’t take so much energy, and it won’t make unnecessary messes that you are going to have to clean up instead of enjoying your ice cream.
The AFA recently had sent its alert to supporters regarding McDonald's joining the special-interest organization, which lists McDonald's on its website as a "corporate partner and organization ally" for an undisclosed financial contribution, and the company's installing one of its officers on the NGLCC board. In response, McDonald's has been dispatching e-mails justifying its actions. -WorldNetDaily
This past week we looked at the seventh commandment. You know, the one about adultery.
No, like many of the commandments, it's not the most warm and fuzzy thing to teach on, especially when Jesus backs us in a corner when He says...
"You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit adultery;' but I tell you that everyone who gazes at a woman to lust after her has committed adultery with her already in his heart" Matthew 5:27
Ouch, that hurt. "O.k. O.k., I admit it! Jesus, I need you to save me from my wretched, opportunistic, adulterous heart." So, if you see me walking around the mall with one of those cone things they put on the faces of dogs, you'll know why. There's not much that has been left a secret at Victoria's Secret or anywhere else, if you know what I mean.
Are Jesus' words purposed on condemning us? Not a chance. But they are purposed on confronting us and convicting us so that we see the diseased nature of our heart before a holy God and reach out in desperation, repentance and thanksgiving when He offers us the cure (Jesus Christ's blood shed on the cross) and receive it through faith and trust in Him.
Below are links to the audio of it and some notes to help follow along.
Audio- MP3 "The Truth about Hell"
Audio- Real Player "The Truth about Hell"
Notes- PDF "The Truth about Hell"
.
.
O.k., so pretty much everybody in "Church-world" knows who Rob Bell is... right?
His video series Nooma, books and recent tour have caught a lot of press. As one who has been in ministry for a good bit of time, I know people can be critical of all the wrong things, for all the wrong reasons, in all the wrong ways. Pretty much no matter what you do and why you do it, there will always be those who find fault or need for improvement. Yet at the same time, in a Christian culture that is easily swooned by the latest fads, there is need for a good measure of "testing the spirits." Not for the purpose of harm or out of spirit of jealousy, but as means of discernment and counsel where needed and appropriate.
In the past I have had direct experience with Rob Bell and of course, I have read the many blogs that share critical viewpoints of his theology and swagger. On the one hand he is obviously gifted, passionate and I would also say, well intentioned. On the other, his intellectualism and celebrity seem to give one the sense that he may error on the side of putting his creativity mind and gifts in analysis above a healthy submission to the clear, yet at times bitter, truths of scripture that may not support his interpretive thrusts and postmodern branding. It appears at times he takes a bit too much enjoyment in hearing himself speak and gleaning his own artistry of words to communicate fresh interpretation for a new culture.
In the process, likes others before him, what he communicates is, in my view, mostly accurate and true to scripture (not to say how beautiful and elegantly spoken), it's that sketchy 10% that gets mixed in at times that makes you go "yikes." For example, in a interview, Rob really side steps the biblical assertions regarding the reality of hell.
Interviewer to Rob: You recently preached a sermon called “God wants to save Christians from hell.” I was discussing the message with a guy who after hearing this message was a bit disturbed and somehow came to the conclusion that you didn’t believe in a literal hell. Let me ask you, do you believe in a literal hell that is defined simply as eternal separation from God?
Rob: Well, there are people now who are seriously separated from God. So I would assume that God will leave room for people to say “no I don’t want any part of this”. My question would be, does grace win or is the human heart stronger than God’s love or grace. Who wins, does darkness and sin and hardness of heart win or does God’s love and grace win?
I don’t know why as a Christian you would have to make such declarative statements. Like your friend, does he want there to be a literal hell? I am a bit skeptical of somebody who argues that passionately for a literal hell, why would you be on that side? Like if you are going to pick causes, if you’re literally going to say these are the lines in the sand, I’ve got to know that people are going to burn forever, this is one of the things that you drive your stake in the ground on. I don’t understand that.
Could he have just had a bad day with words? Sure. I do all the time. But at the same time, there is a bit of a dance around the subject that raises the brow. A biblical view of Hell is a topic that is not only what I believe to be an "essential" of our faith, but also one that requires us to move away from a man-centered Gospel to a Jesus-centered one.
We all need correction and wise counsel. And as it is for all of us, there is room for Rob to grow and mature and there is room for legitimate concern and healthy criticism of his ministry. That's a given for anybody in ministry at anytime. It's easy to see the speck in another's ministry eye and not the plank in our own. So for all you who would take pleasure in seeing Rob burned as a heretic or at the least see his ministry crumble, be careful. And yet for those of you who seem to worship him and automatically reject any words that would stain his rock star status as the postmodern Billy graham of a new generation, be careful.
That said, I hope Rob has surrounded himself with people who will "speak the truth in love" and at the same time not close himself off so tight that he misses the God-ventriloquism of voices from afar that bring to the banquet of his fruited heart and gifts some well-intentioned concerns that may just be authored by God's restorative work in Rob's life... how ironic.
Recently, I listened to a series of messages by Brian Houston, Hillsong Church. In this series he talked about God given platforms... opportunities God gives you to minister to others and put Him on display. In that series, God really "got up in my kool-aid" and backed me into a corner. I realized that in my pursuit of the seemingly prestigious platforms of others, I was missing the potential and power of the platforms God had and was giving me. And most of all, in doing so, I was setting myself against God and God against me.
It was as if the heavens opened and God spoke to me.. "Chris, your platform(s) is no small thing, and as long as it is to you, you are against the Lord."
Yikes, all this time I have been against the Lord. Here I thought the platform was ahead of me to someday be realized in a blaze of ministry glory, only to find out is was under me. I was on it all along, but was too ego-driven to see it, appreciate it, nor harness it. "Hello, my name is Chris Kratzer and I have platform-envy."
I am not alone. There is a powerful passage in the Bible where God is against Korah because of his platform-envy.
Then Moses said to Korah, "Hear now, you sons of Levi: Is it a small thing to you that the God of Israel has separated you from the congregation of Israel, to bring you near to Himself, to do the work of the tabernacle of the Lord, and to stand before the congregation to serve them;
Therefore you and all your company are gathered together against the Lord. And what is Aaron that you complain against him?"
Korah too, had a God give platform. The problem was, for whatever reason, it wasn't good enough for Him. His platform was a "small thing" to him.
I am taking some serious time to repent to God for all the platforms that have been a "small thing" to me, what a looser I am before God. Never again! God gives the platforms, and they are no small thing. The only thing that can be small about a God-given platform is what you do with it.
So now I have a new saying, "It's not the size of the platform, it is the size of the person on it" Jesus took a serious downgrade in platform when he stepped out of heaven to be born in a manger here in this sin-sick world. Look what he did with that platform. It was no small thing to him.
What are your platforms? Are they a small thing to you? Do you have platform-envy?
Blessings,
Chris



